Quantcast
 Everett True

this is why we have YouTube: Amy Winehouse drunk in Belgrade

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

Amy Winehouse drunk in Belgrade 2011

You know, you could make the following out to be a reason why we don’t need music criticism/journalism any more …

I disagree. I want to know more. The context, the reasons, what the crowd looked like, how many songs did she actually fuck up on (was this an aberration?), what the knock-on effects were, what the sound was like, how the band reacted, the mood backstage, what other songs she sang, whether this is the norm …

I really like Amy.

Even so, the above is a fairly compelling argument for why the Internet can be so fun. A few years back, we’d have had to rely on a few shocked word-of-mouth reports and tried to gauge for ourselves whether exaggeration was involved. Now we get to witness the car crashes without any of the unpleasant smells.

P.S. A former colleague has just picked up on that final paragraph. I wondered whether anyone would.

“‘ … whether exaggeration was involved’?” she quotes me. “You’re implying video can’t exaggerate or distort! Not sure about that…”

I wasn’t meaning to, actually – because I’m fully aware it can. Only the other weekend, on an Unconvention panel, I needed to remind someone that both photography and video can distort, if not downright lie. (This to someone who runs a video site, and should have known better. He was trying the old line that videoing something is somehow more ‘honest’ than writing about something.) I knew it was an ambivalent statement, and should have been expanded upon further, but my attention was distracted. I was writing the post while trying to put my two sons to bed.

Glad to have the opportunity to clarify.

Amy Winehouse R.I.P.

6 Responses to this is why we have YouTube: Amy Winehouse drunk in Belgrade

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.