Quantcast
 Everett True

Is it OK to write negative reviews of other people’s music?

Is it OK to write negative reviews of other people’s music?
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

So, we opened up the “secret” Collapse Board Contributors Facebook group to a few hundred readers the other day. Cue much confusion and hilarity and the odd piece of incredible music being shared. After the usual butt-clenching and soul-wringing and back-slapping, a few folk posited that they could indeed write some stuff for Collapse Board themselves… i.e. contribute. Now this, I love. The old participant/observer. About three people actually volunteered and a discussion was had, briefly – about the ethics and knock-on effects of writing negative reviews of other people’s music if you’re in a band yourself. I thought it was an interesting discussion, so I’ve decided to reproduce it here. (Anyone else want to contribute to Collapse Board or form a band with me? Contact me via Facebook, esp. if y’r female…we all know that a decent man is hard to find. I am way serious right now.) I didn’t ask anyone’s permission to reprint this discussion as I figured calling a Facebook group Collapse Board Contributors might give the game away that I’d be lifting the odd comment for the site – especially given my past form in such matters – and delight in pushing at the boundaries of what is considered music criticism in these increasingly homogenised days.

So, in deference to the fact there are real live people involved in this discussion, I’ve removed all names… except for Scott Creney’s because he is a demigod among craven crawling turtles. And I’m still hoping he’s going to start writing for CB again one of these decades. 

Enough waffle. I need a stiff drink or an editor or another bout with Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter, whichever is closest to hand.

Oh, and be sure to check out my inspired attack on the circumstances surrounding the sudden burst of adulation around the new D’Angelo album… so you can rub it in my face when I admit a few weeks down the line to really liking it. 

Folk ask, do you ever regret anything you’ve written? All the fucking time. Trust me. It’s the only sort of criticism that matters, that which holds the potential for great personal embarrassment.

Anyway. On with the show. I am still waiting for the fucking review, by the way.

Contributor 1: Do you think it is ok to write a negative or semi-negative review of other people’s music? I mean if it wasn’t ok surely we would all just trust the media releases of band publicists and promoters? Does it make it more authentic to write a negative review if you are also an artist/musician, subject to others’ reviews? I mean Bukowski used to write poems bagging out other poets…I just think there are certain scenes/cliques around where if you are negative about someone elses’ output you get blacklisted and I don’t think that should be the case…

Contributor 2: Negative reviews are the best reviews.

Contributor 1: Yes, I am a bit overwhelmed by all the back-slapping that is supposed to go on around my town.

Contributor 3 (OK, me then): Scott Creney, would you like to field this one?

Contributor 1: I should say, underwhelmed not overwhelmed.

Contributor 1:  Maybe established writer-critics are immune compared to when artists themselves offer music criticism. Something to do with credentials…

Contributor 4: Of course it’s ‘ok’ to write a negative review, if it reflects your honest, considered and balanced opinion. It seems the world is becoming too small a place for negativity, which is a shame, as empiricism recognises a negative result as being of equal value to a positive one… Similarly, as a visual artist I find documented criticism of all kinds is all but eschewed, and rather that work is ‘placed’ in terms of its etymology… It seems that the postmodern acceptance of everything having equal value has become a common trope, which leaves us purely in the hands of shamelessly hyperbolic (self-) promoters – but, as we all know in our heart of hearts, a shit burger is a shit burger…

Contributor 1: I suppose it is a matter of selling out. As a local band we need support of other local bands/promoters etc, so writing negative reviews about our fellow local bands will not help that. Hence need to write reviews anonymously, but I just think people shouldn’t be so thin-skinned! Hell, I can take it myself, I know some people love my band to bits and some aren’t fussed… I enjoy all opinions however.

Scott Creney: It’s never okay to write a negative review. The music industry is made up of some of the stupidest & scaredest people you’d never want to meet, and they’ll just hate you for ruining their already shrinking profit margin (and music writers who are ‘in the biz’ will hate you for ruining their already shrinking credibility & social capital, not to mention the fact that you felt free to write something that they couldn’t/wouldn’t). And if you’re in a band, then they’ll just dismiss your negativity as jealousy or an attempt to make your band more popular. The only exception involves a record that everyone has already agreed is crap. Say, Metallica/Lou Reed’s Lulu. If everyone agrees it’s crap then polish up the knives and bust out your best one-liners.

Contributor 1: Whatever happened to free speech… jeez. I’ve now discovered you can pay faceless people to ‘review’ your songs which then may or may not pass muster for publication… nice way for them to make money from unsigned bands… but aside from that I don’t think it’s at all punk to feel repressed enough to refrain from giving considered, honest reviews of other bands just cos it might impact on one’s own artistic endeavour. So, look out.

Contributor 5: Likewise do you think it’s ok to write a positive or semi-positive review of other people’s music… without other people questioning your motives or integrity? For example, you might be super-excited about a band/record and then other people suggest you must be wrong because: a) you got that record for free (most likely), b) you’re friends with the band/label (most likely), c) it can’t possibly be as great as you say it is because Pitchfork/Vice/The Guardian’s music columnist/some authoritative voice hasn’t bigged it up yet already, d) it can’t possibly be as great as you say it is because they haven’t heard of it yet and they refuse to be suggestible, e) from your description of the music it sounds derivative and therefore can’t be any good, f) from your description of the music it sounds weird and therefore can’t be any good, g) you’ve not quoted from the press release so therefore you can’t be a real ‘professional’ music journalist/blogger, h) you used a lot of hyperbole and exclamation marks and as a result I hate you, i) they’ve never heard of the blog/fanzine/website/newspaper you’re writing for before so therefore this must be a put on, j) they can’t trust the opinions of someone they’ve never met, k) they can’t trust the opinions of someone they did meet, disappointingly, that one time, l) you heard the record before it was released, m) you heard the record after it was released, n) you write too much, o) you write too little, p) you look/smell/talk funny, q) you used the term ‘super excited’, r) you used the term ‘band’, s) you made a list of things, t) you didn’t describe the music at all in your review but talked about some or other shit (politics? gender? the bands shoes?) and they can’t figure out why… I mean, I could go on… u) you didn’t get to ‘z’, etc.

INTERJECTION (from me, Everett True, the big boss man at the top of the page):

I’d like to say at this junction that a) I never get records for free, b) I have no friends, c) I’m always at least 10 months behind Vice and Pitchfork unless I’m early in which case everyone ignores me – and d) rightly so, how dare a voice that isn’t preaching from a soapbox of authority dare to claim greatness for some artist you’ve never heard of, and BANGS KNOWS you’re not suggestible, e) I’ve heard way too little music so I find it hard to make anything sound derivative, f) confusion = sex, but that line in itself is a cliché, g) I never see press releases unless I’m working for ‘proper’ newspapers in which case I like to slip on the mantle of ‘professional’ music journalist and write the same review as everyone else, derived word-for-word from the press release, h) a journalist at the NME was asked what they hated about 1985 and they replied “exclamation marks” in direct reference to me, i) no one, but NO ONE, has heard of Collapse Board outside of its tiny sainted circle of losers and retard music fans – unless they’re U2 fans and then they think it’s some amazingly meaningful song, j) see point b, k) this has happened to me so often – people being disappointed then I’m not some sort of raging manipulative drunken egotist – I can’t even begin to count the times. Alright then. 3,001, l) I have no idea what ‘records’ are and whether they still even exist, m) I make it a point of never listening to records I review – at least not till after I hand the review in and then I can be pleasantly surprised at my own prescience, n) I never write too much, o) I never write too little, p) I do smell funny according to my children, q) I prefer “fucking psyched”, r) I never use the term band unless it has the words “male-led” in front of it, s) is there a single critic on the interweb in 2015 who DOESN’T make a list of things, t) I make it a point of NEVER describing the music in my reviews because otherwise I run the risk of lying (see point m) and I value integrity above everything else… unless anyone wants to give me a blowjob give me some kudos for a good review (this has only happened a a few dozen times never)… I did get to z) actually, but I figured that answering all your other points, even the ones you didn’t write down, verged on arrogant. And Morrissey knows, I’d never want to be that.

OK, as you were.

Contributor 4:  So, is it OK to have an opinion you want to communicate to other people…?

Scott Creney: It’s never okay to write positive reviews. It only feeds the capitalist/consumerist beast that seeks to devour us all. And the people who benefit are just going to spend all their money on shitty drugs anyway.

Contributor 6: Yeh…! any press is good press. Fuk all this PoliCorr New Whirrled Ordah silliness. Be honest and poetic and Nature will adorn you with Giggles ‘n’ Winks…

Related posts (and if you ain’t read this one, you really REALLY should): An Immodest Proposal

One Response to Is it OK to write negative reviews of other people’s music?

  1. Emmad January 22, 2015 at 9:31 pm

    It’s not about whether it’s a positive or negative review. I can make up my own mind about whatever is being reviewed. For me, it’s about how entertaining the writing is. That’s probably why I keep coming back to CB, even though you shit me off most of the time.

    ps Come back Scott!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.