Quantcast
 Everett True

The art of creating popular music criticism in 2012 | 50 REALLY HOT PHOTOS OF KATY PERRY TOPLESS*

The art of creating popular music criticism in 2012 | 50 REALLY HOT PHOTOS OF KATY PERRY TOPLESS*
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

From BuzzFeed (a website probably at least a quarter of my Facebook friends visit regularly, and several of which quote regularly in their Facebook feed).

30 Reasons Why Katy Perry Is The World’s Best Popstar

1. She likes to have fun.
4. She looks hot even when she’s not trying.
7. She’s sexy without being skanky.
13. She laughs off the criticism because she’s fabulous.
17. She works the hair flip.

All these reasons are accompanied by suitable photos or videos (though, to BuzzFeed’s credit, you don’t have to click on 30 different pages to discover the 30 different reasons). These reasons are in-full. It’s like a web 2.0 version of what Mad Magazine used to do in the 50s and 60s but minus any of the subversive undercurrents. And with added bonus objectifying and implicit lads-together sexism. (And, of course, it’s not a million miles away from what happens here.)

It’s humour, you retards! Don’t you get that you’re not meant to get it?! Well, duh.

As The Quietus puts it in the middle of a weighty article around social media and the way information dispersal has started to shift away from Google:

… None of this is lost on the powers at Buzzfeed. They understand we’re entering a new phase where content is distributed and shared via social media channels, and they also understand that in order to succeed, you can’t trick people with a racy headline and then offer them nothing more than a one-paragraph rewrite of a press release when they click on it. You need to respect your readers and produce work that’s not afraid to stand out while also being of genuine interest to people; which, in the case of Buzzfeed, admittedly means a willingness to embrace viral silliness alongside the serious – but even their silly side is pinned together with a wit and creativity you don’t see on other viral chasing sites.

Does any of this sound familiar to long-time readers of the Quietus? With everything increasingly shifting to mobile now and your timeline or newsfeed increasingly serving as your window to everything, there’s a greater and greater opportunity for sites with a distinctive voice to not just survive, but thrive. If you’re wondering “Yeah, but where’s the money in all this?”, have a look at this letter Buzzfeed’s Jonah Peretti wrote to his staff this year. Thanks to their focus on sharable quality, Buzzfeed’s revenue in July was already on pace to be three times more than what they made in 2011.

If you’re wondering why an essay on the digital landscape and media is appearing on a music site like the Quietus, it’s because all of this points to the possibility of a near future where something more substantive in our cultural lives may finally have a real opportunity. The old guard and models of the press (music or otherwise) will meanwhile likely continue their slide towards oblivion, if they keep circling their wagons around once exclusive terrain that will only continue to crumble away from beneath their feet. If you’re someone in a band or thinking of starting your own label or music blog then you should also pay attention because companies like Soundcloud and Spotify – who have both just announced new ways they’ll attempt to suggest and help you discover music in 2013 – are putting all their energy into joining the fight for your attention.

Give Us Your Eyes: 2012 Content Wars & The Attention Economy

(Those links are worth clicking on, especially the letter from Jonah Peretti. ‘Quality’ really is subjective, isn’t it?)

I think I’d take issue with the whole contention that “you can’t trick people with a racy headline and then offer them a one-paragraph rewrite of a press release when they click on it”, because I thought that was ONLY what BuzzFeed does, certainly in the world of music. (*Irony upon irony. That’s what I’ve done here.) Unless, of course, the bar is now being set so low that a dozen photographs and videos of Katy Perry looking “sexy” and being “fun” is preferable to a dozen websites writing about Katy Perry’s latest single when all they do is paraphrase the party line… and embed a few photographs of her looking “hot”. Don’t most people surf the internet only looking for photographs of cute cats and pornography anyway?

Flash backwards a few days to this:

Sung by 2007 Canadian Idol runner-up Carly Rae Jepsen, its the tale of a girl who bumps into a totes dreamy boy, impulsively gives him her number (Carly’s CRAZY and just does things like this) and asks him to call her, maybe. That’s it. Rihanna’s sexual voraciousness, the trashy alco-pop of Ke$ha and Katy Perry, Adele’s bath-of-my-own-tears emoshion – they all seem somewhat heavy and overcomplicated after hearing this. It’s like being taken back to the golden age of 90s girl-next-door pop, where Sixpence None the Richer and Lene Marlin are swooning around wearing long denim skirts and James Van Der Beek is about to say something really deep.

The best song of 2012: Carly Rae Jepsen – Call Me Maybe (from The Guardian)

The entire review reads like it was written by someone who picked the short straw to write 450 words about a song that none of The Guardian‘s music writers really care about, but everyone agrees should be Song of the Year anyway, because that will really wind up those indie kids/dad rockers... How very post-structuralist. I have nothing against the song (although I usually prefer singers with a modicum of personality). I have everything against college boy writers harking back to “the golden age of 90s girl-next-door pop” and pretending they’re still 15.

I guess when taken in conjunction with such a patronising attempt to be, a) down with the kids and b) viral, maybe running seven photographs of Katy Perry looking gormless under the heading “Her hair is a rainbow” is preferable. At least BuzzFeed doesn’t pretend that their article is anything beyond fluff. I have nothing against discourse around music intended for popular consumption. And I also have little time for snobs who contend one form of music is better than another because tweenage girls haven’t heard of it. But The Guardian‘s choice of song seems such a blatant attempt to court controversy AND be hip to audience culture. They are not arguing as themselves.

So. I guess my question for today is: Is it all worth it? Is this what we really have to do to compete in the modern world?

Fun is great. I’m just not sure that reinforcement of the status quo and aesthetic values based around YouTube views is my idea of fun.

ADDENDA
Buzzfeed’s music editor Matthew Perpetua has since contacted me on Twitter to say that the post “was a user submission and has nothing to do with the music vertical. Trust me, I hate that post as much as you do”.

He adds: “I know there’s a plan to make the user submissions stand out more obviously on the site, very eager for that to happen.”

Check out Matthew’s approved BuzzFeed music writing here, under BuzzFeed Best Music.

10 Responses to The art of creating popular music criticism in 2012 | 50 REALLY HOT PHOTOS OF KATY PERRY TOPLESS*

  1. Matthew Perpetua December 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    I’m the music editor at BuzzFeed. I’d like to clear up one thing: That Katy Perry post was a user submission from the community. People are free to submit posts, and we have the option to pick them up. I didn’t pick that post up – frankly, I kinda loathe it – but I did have it toned down a lot before it was put into the mix on the site. It is not in the music vertical and has nothing at all to do with music vertical. It is sort of aggravating that people can’t easily tell the difference between the user content and the editorial content – well, I mean, they can if they look at the bylines but really does that? (Clearly not career journalists.)

  2. Jake December 18, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    Matthew, the diversion of accountability in this case might hold up if you didn’t have access to the post before it was published, but you’re suggesting you have a moderator’s privilege (as I’d expect from a publication’s editor) and yet you couldn’t veto the piece entirely? This kind of piece isn’t questionably acceptable, it’s downright offensive despite your best attempts to “have it toned down”. Given your history I think a lot of people (myself included) expected that when you took on the job at BuzzFeed you’d be curating pieces that were as intelligent and entertaining as I’m sure you know music criticism can be (Jamieson Cox’s Passion Pit article, for example), not vacillating between thoughtful writing and regular BuzzFeed trash. I appreciate that it’s BuzzFeed Music and as such beholden to their organisational philosophies but if you really do loathe it, surely there’s more you could’ve done in your role as editor to have it kept off the site. I don’t know if you understand that stuff like this retroactively devalues all of the other good work BuzzFeed Music has done over the past months by eroding goodwill for the benefit of cheap traffic and attention.

  3. Everett True December 18, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    I actually assumed that this was the *only* type piece BuzzFeed runs, as it’s the only type I ever see in my Facebook feeds.

    I’m happy (but surprised) to hear there’s far more to music writing at BuzzFeed.

  4. Matthew Perpetua December 18, 2012 at 9:45 pm

    Oh, I know how it looks. The post never went into the music section, it was picked up by the celeb section.

  5. James Flint December 19, 2012 at 9:07 pm

    Lets face it, people prefer form over substance, and when I say form, I mean porn.

  6. Derek Robertson December 21, 2012 at 9:21 pm

    As bad as shit like this is when it comes to music writing, it’s indicative of a wider trend across the the internet and the whole cultural sphere in general. Everything – from books to films to even what used to pass as “news” – is now simply regarded as link bait and engaged in a seemingly never ending race to the bottom. Any kind of well thought out, logical, cleverly argued pieces are inevitably relegated to the fringes as people just don’t appear interested, and get tagged as tldr or some such rubbish.

    As an example, look at the Guardian fron page today (21st Dec 2012). Despite all the various serious and important stuff going on – corruption in the Met, Murdoch allegedly attempting to skew the US elections, the Fiscal Cliff negotiations – what’s front and centre in the photo box? A (badly) photoshopped image of the Earth on fire alongside “Apocalypse Now? End of the World – Live Blog”. Fuck me. If this is what they are relying on, no wonder they are losing money and readers.

  7. Rich Jensen December 30, 2012 at 6:53 am

    Where is the link to the other 49 pictures?

  8. Everett True December 30, 2012 at 6:54 am

    It’s coming in 49 instalments.

  9. Gary Stafford December 31, 2012 at 10:46 pm

    I heart Katy perry!!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *